AUDIO
![]() |
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
|
Manufacturing Depression by Gary Greenberg
Is depression truly a disease? What is the basis for that diagnosis? How accurate is a diagnosis of depression? How do we define what "normal mental health" is, so that we can decide what depression is? Do people get depressed, or just sad?
These are very controversial questions, and psychotherapist Gary Greenberg doesn't hold back as he researches the answers. He even chronicles his own journey through depression and the efficacy (or not) of a variety of treatments.
I found the questions compelling, and his story and research very convincing. However, it needs to be mentioned that his experiences are in the US healthcare system; and that there is much more freedom to advertise anti-depressants in the States.
Some of the highlights of Greenberg's analysis:
"¢ The message that depression results from a chemical imbalance in our brain, and is a serious medical condition that can be treated, has saturated our popular culture. It is now virtually unquestionable (except by Greenberg).
"¢ Has depression been manufactured, not as an illness but as an idea? Do we believe we have a right to be happy? Do we think that all suffering, emotional as well as physical, is wrong and should be relieved?
"¢ How can depression be called a disease when the only diagnosis is descriptive; there is no medical test to confirm diagnosis, unlike an infection?
"¢ Greenberg concludes that it is possible that the descriptive tests used to diagnose depression could possibly lead to a diagnosis that the whole world is insane: "an enormous market opportunity for an industry that would aim its magic bullets at insanity."
"¢ One of the problems in getting approval for depression-relieving drugs was a requirement by the Federal Drugs Authority in the US for proof that it was effective with a particular disease. This meant that depression had to be named as a specific illness.
"¢ Depression drugs actually perform poorly in trials, and do not just block serotonin, causing many different forms of discomfort.
"¢ In 2003-4 a group of researchers tested the diagnostic methods of 152 family GPs. The GPs knew they were going to be tested, but not when. The team used actors to simulate two forms of depressive disorder; and they also had two scripts: one where they asked for a drug by name, and the second where they just asked about any anti-depressant. They also had the option of not asking for drugs at all. The results were embarrassing. 31% of the times they didn't ask for drugs, they were prescribed drugs anyway; 53% asking for a specific drug received a script for it; and 76% of those occasions when they asked for "a medicine" were prescribed an anti-depressant. Greenberg points out that when a patient asks for drugs it is not a symptom of depression or any other disease except substance abuse disorder!
Greenberg contends that no matter how good your actors are, or how well you know the symptoms, you cannot fake diabetes. There is a test which a doctor must do, and receive a positive result for, before insulin is prescribed.
He also points out that the rush to prescribe and take drugs insulates us from the roller-coaster of life: the highs and lows, the joys and sadness, the awareness of our own mortality, our weakness and inadequacy, our passions and desires… And medication means we can get on with the busyness of life.
While reading this book I went to visit a friend of mine who had been hospitalised earlier this year suffering from stress. He explained to me that his doctor had diagnosed him with an anxiety disorder and prescribed anti-depressants. They had improved his lifestyle immeasurably. He saw life in colours again, he was able to experience joy, he had become much easier for his family to be with, and he was more effective at work.
It made me realise that whatever the truth of Greenberg's claims, they relate to rapid diagnosis, over-prescription, and negligence on the part of doctors in following through with care. For many, these drugs truly have made life able to be enjoyed again, prevented heart attacks and suicides, and saved marriages.
In his final chapter titled "The Magnificence of Normal" Greenberg ends his journey through depression research with the following comments:
Call your sorrow a disease or don't. Take drugs or don't. See a therapist or don't. but whatever you do, when life drives you to your knees, which it is bound to do, which maybe it is meant to do, don't settle for being sick in the brain. Remember that's just a story. You can tell your own story about your discontents, and my guess is that it will be a better one than the doctors have manufactured.
This is a provocative book, but it is important that this topic is explored, especially as the World Health Organisation predicts that in the next decade depression will be the single biggest health burden on the world.
Greenberg would agree that for individuals feeling overwhelmed, or travelling through deep troughs of sustained unhappiness, the first step is to see a GP; and to ensure that any suggested treatment treats the possible causes as well as symptoms.


I always wonder about that 'chemical imbalance'. It seems to me that it is like saying that a headache is the result of a lack of aspirin (or similar) in the brain.
If a person is such that nobody ever agrees with them about anything, the inevitable result, I believe, is that they will become depressed. "It is not good for man to be alone." Being alone is the opposite of being in fellowship. Being in fellowship requires agreement at some level, otherwise there is no fellowship. (This is one of the ultimate purposes of life. The most overlooked treasure is that we who are Christians are temples of the Holy Spirit and can reach out to one another with spiritual hands - we can relate to each other spiritually. That is why small groups are so important, because they see Christians facing each other rather than looking at the back of each others heads in church.) In Amos 3:3, it says, "Can two walk together, unless they are agreed?"
I don't believe that the fundamental causation is that physiological decline causes depression. I believe that the fundamental causation is that isolation causes depression which causes physiological decline.
This is a profound topic, in my opinion, like your recent post on something like, "How We're Working Isn't Working". That post was so profound that I didn't comment on it. As a topic, I found it to be just too enormous.
So let's clarify what sort of depression you have in mind.
Regarding Philip's comment about psychotic people, I don't believe that they need medication, I believe that they need deliverance from demonic possession. The medication is simply acting as the equivalent of a strait-jacket. It is a form of restraint.
I have seen people living on the street who are obviously depressed who don't go around attacking people. So my point is that psychotic behaviour has a different source than just feeling sad about life. In Jesus' day there were a lot of people who were possessed by demons. I don't see why it should be any different now.
If a person is in a psychotic state it does not necessarily mean that they "go around attacking people". That is folklore, not fact.
In my experience, those who try to "heal" psychosis via Jesus-like exorcisms are entirely ineffective, or actually exacerbate the problem. Definitely more harm than good.
Yeah, I see what you mean. I thought that Philip was referring to people who go on a rampage against others but obviously he didn't say that.
In any case, I don't believe that prescription medicine is the answer. I think that this is just masking an underlying cause.
Thee:
So the cause and answer are...?
If psychosis really is caused by demons, as you "believe", why aren't all the psych wards being emptied by Christian exorcists? Plenty of work there for the "finger of God"...
The brain is a machine just like any other part of our body, and it can break down like any other part of our body. I have no idea how some Christians can maintain the fiction that mental disorder is caused by a lack of faith or demonic possession but not apply that same standard to disorders of the rest of the body. The recounts of Jesus' miracles mostly record the healing of "physical" disorder, yet very few people here would find it acceptable to tell a paraplegic that they can't walk because they lack faith.
So, I don't know. Cause of psychosis is trauma. Answer is telling somebody about the trauma you went through who can affirm its damaging effects rather than tell you to "get over it". You need somebody to talk to who will agree that you have suffered harm if that is the case. Answer is asking God to comfort you and heal you by his Holy Spirit. Often the healing process takes years.
Anyway, this blog is not about psychosis, it's about modern depression which is an epidemic. Actually, I think some of the causes are related to Kara's previous article about "How We're Working Isn't Working". Alot of people feel like they're locked into a way of living and working which they don't feel is ultimately going to benefit them or lead them anywhere good. For example, many people are retiring without enough money to live on.
Nice try at ground-shifting. You stated @ #4:
Not much nuance or qualification there. And when I take you at your word that you believe psychosis is caused by demons, you write (@ #9):
But you did say it. Having located the fault in me, you proceed to qualify your original bare equation psychosis = demon possession as follows:
You didn't actually say or imply that at all @ #4. A word to the wise: perhaps you should think twice before you press Submit. Backpedalling is so ungainly.
Why am I making such a big deal of this? Because I have seen untold damage done to people's psyches by unqualified statements like yours @ #4. If that's not what you mean, don't say it in the first place.
The reality is that everything the human body needs to function correctly in a physiological sense can be found in proper natural nutrition - whole grains, steamed vegetables, fresh fruit, eggs, fish et cetera in conjunction with purified water and quality natural nutritional supplements to overcome problems with the quality of foods in today's environment. The effect that anti-depressants have by enlivening a person can be achieved through proper nutrition. However proper nutrition is not the magic bullet solution to depression. A person can have proper nutrition and be in good health but without proper relationships and meaningful interaction with other people, they will still be vulnerable to depression. Depression is ultimately about whether a person perceives life to be worth living.
The modern epidemic of depression is ultimately the result of the break-down of community. The proportion of single-person households has been increasing over the last twenty years. This leads to increasing isolation, decreasing social interaction and, consequently, a depression epidemic.
Medication is not the answer for some forms of depression as Nicky has commented, but is life-saving in forms where there is profound slowing (melancholia) or psychosis (hallucinations or delusions).
I also think there is some confusion here around the term "disease". Depression is a disease in the classic "bio-psycho-social" model of disease as defined for decades now. It has a biological, psychological and social component. Disease has not been thought of as purely organic or chemical for 50 years now. Perhaps that answers Andrew's points. But, to deny the biological component is wrong. Antidepressants do have good evidence for working in the subset I have mentioned.
I hope that anyone reading suffering from depression might not be discouraged by these posts, but know that there is good help easily available. Also that we are all such fragile "jars of clay" (2 Cor 4) - depression is no reason to give up trusting in Christ.
BTW -the website Nicky pointed to is a ".org" , and not a ".com"
(www.beyondblue.org.au)
I would reiterate that Greenberg is typically dealing with the US health system where drug companies can advertise, and there seems to be a greater propensity to medicate.
I would really be concerned if people decided not to take medication prescribed, or decided not to see a GP as a result of reading this review.
There is also the issue raised of how much as a society we want an "instant" solution to all our problems, including the "problem" of sadness.
I agree that the Beyond Blue website is extremely helpful.
I am really glad there has been an opportunity to discuss some of the issues raised in the book, and the conversation needs to continue, with input from experts.
I am going for something nice and light and fluffy for my next blog ;)
Is this actually true? Haven't they just invented new imaging scanners that can 'see' depression or altered neural activity in the brain? Sorry, no link. I can't remember where I saw it. It's in my brain somewhere...
Try this link Dave :
http://nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2008/imaging-identifies-brain-regions-and-chemicals-underlying-mood-disorders-may-lead-to-better-treatments.shtml