AUDIO

by Archbishop Peter Jensen
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
Dear Nathan Rees
Michael Jensen
September 21st, 2009

Nathan,

We've never met, but we are about the same age, and we both studied English lit at Sydney Uni at about the same time. Didn't notice you in Manning Bar, but you were probably too busy cycling a thousand kms a week. You are the first NSW Premier we've had from our generation. John Brogden could have been, but Macquarie St chewed him up and spat him out. Well, that and his own lapses, which we weren't able to forgive and for which he couldn't forgive himself.

I am under no illusions as to the size of your task. Only Liberal bumbling of Clouseau-esque proportions kept Labor in power under Iemma. And yet getting rid of Morris seemed a baffling move to us, the regular voters who chose him. No matter: what's gone is gone - and Iemma's well gone.

And so now it's you. The sound of the blades being sharpened behind you is growing louder. The veniality of some of your colleagues has become proverbial. One of your most able ministers - though a rival, so you must be feeling some sense of schadenfreude - couldn't keep his flies done up. The voters would love to hand you and your government an early retirement.

And that's not because of Macquarie St subterfuge. It's because all the things that are supposed to be working aren't - and we all know they aren't, we who pause at water coolers on a Monday morning to discuss the news of the day.

It's what we experience on the ground. Public transport, for instance - a laughing-(rather than rolling?)-stock. The hospital system - just pray you don't get sick. Fewer beds than years ago. DOCS. The poor under-funded and badly-resourced schools.

But I am not writing to add to the list of gripers. That's part of the problem, too: that NSW is notorious as a state that eats its own. It is a hard place - a place built on hard justice, a people who have never really accepted that forgiveness was an option. You get a fair go, but not a second go. I can't imagine how hard it is to rule the unruly.

No gripes from me. No: you are our leader, however that came to pass. Now - please, just govern us. Make use of whatever time remains to make a difference to our state. Show that you are not only a man of the backrooms and shadowy halls of party-politics, and step up to the mark. Get that party room in order. Restore our belief in the majesty of democratic government. We need to know it works.

Good government is a fragile and precious thing, and it needs to be protected with all we have. That it is easy to say - and who wouldn't agree? But it is not good enough that the people of NSW have become so cynical about their elected (well, kinda elected) government. We have become complacent. It was only a generation ago that corruption at the very top level was the norm in these parts; and criminals and corrupt cops stalked the streets of Sydney with impunity. Have we forgotten how justice can evaporate like the water in Warragamba? Too many of your citizens have fled from places where the idea of good government is a rumour. For their sakes alone we need you to be vigilant.

But what I want tell you most of all is that even though some of us didn't vote for your party, the Christians of your state are praying for you mate. We are praying for you in your (as we believe) divinely-appointed task of leading our state. After all, most people can see that it's a job that can't be done on human strength alone.

Sincerely yours

Michael Jensen

Justin Moffatt    21 September 2009 7:58pm
So....

Do we wait for Mr Rees to respond before we can say anything...?

#2 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    21 September 2009 8:03pm
:-)

I would have thought it was unlikely that he would!

It is just that the NSW govt has become such a laughing stock that it would be easy for us to forget just how important government is, and how serious these lapses are... don't you think?

#3 of 41 top
Craig Schwarze    21 September 2009 9:00pm
But what I want tell you most of all is that even though some of us didn’t vote for your party, the Christians of your state are praying for you mate.

Nice...I hope that is the case...

#4 of 41 top
Kevin Goddard    21 September 2009 9:12pm
Good government is a fragile and precious thing...*
I agree - but I can't remember when we last had "good government" in this state. I find motherhood statements hard to swallow before breakfast - so I'll post more comments after I have digested this topic some more ;)

#5 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    21 September 2009 9:14pm
Well that's why I say 'that's easy to say'... I KNOW it's a motherhood statement, but Aussie cynicism is just as damaging to the goal of good government as nauseating American idealism - isn't it? And I think we may have forgotten this, just a bit, around here.

#6 of 41 top
Craig Schwarze    21 September 2009 9:25pm
Even our very worst governments in Australia are still pretty good, judged by historical standards.

#7 of 41 top
Justin Moffatt    21 September 2009 9:41pm
MPJ -- Why don't you include a link showing Mr Rees the comments by his former Deputy Prime Minister HERE? He may not like it coming from the other side of politics. But there are some helpful comments there. JMM.

#8 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    21 September 2009 9:44pm
That's true, Craig: but that''s all the more reason to remain vigilant, right?

#9 of 41 top
Craig Schwarze    21 September 2009 10:20pm
Absolutely - it's good (though a bit hypocritical) that we have such high expectations of those who govern us.

Like yourself, I want to head off excessive cynicism/whining...

#10 of 41 top
Ian Tyrrell    21 September 2009 10:22pm
I take it you actually sent this to Mr Rees?

#11 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    21 September 2009 10:39pm
Well, no. An Open Letter is... well, open. That's the generic convention. It's a way of addressing everybody, right?

But if someone could find me Mr Rees' email address I will certainly forward it.

#12 of 41 top
Ian Tyrrell    21 September 2009 10:48pm
You can get his details here.

His email address is: thepremier@www.nsw.gov.au.

I understand an open letter is open, but if the intended recipient isn't a regular reader of the publication, he can hardly be expected to read and/or respond, no? ;)

#13 of 41 top
Jeremy Halcrow    21 September 2009 11:23pm
You should MJ. Even if it is *only* read by a low level flunky.. its still a word of encouragement.

On the substantial issue - you are right that cynicism is a cancer. It means the Libs will be able to be elected in two years without having to do any serious policy work.

#14 of 41 top
Chris Pettett    22 September 2009 12:20am
MJ - thanks for highlighting that no matter how inept the leaders of the nation seem, we still need to pray for them to govern no matter how we cast our vote.

#15 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    22 September 2009 12:32am
Ian - that email address is bouncing.

#16 of 41 top
Ian Tyrrell    22 September 2009 12:36am
I got that one straight off his contact page (also linked - although the SA site has mangled the web address - if you click the link it will take you to an error page - just insert an exclamation mark (!) directly before "OpenDocument" in the address and it will work).

There is an alternate address on the page you can use too - he has multiple addresses based on what the topic is - if it's for him as premier or as Member for Toongabbie

#17 of 41 top
Christopher James Ashton    22 September 2009 1:20am
I can't help but think that your letter promising the prayers of Christians probably presumes a little too much. Certainly I don't see any pattern of praying for our leaders in most Anglican churches, but perhaps your post is a much needed catalyst for obedience.

May I also suggest that an 'Open Letter' is nothing more than self-indulgence if it is not at least sent to the implied recipient. Given the email problems mentioned above might I suggest:

The Honourable Nathan Rees MP
Premier of New South Wales
GPO Box 5341
Sydney NSW 2001

#18 of 41 top
Jim Wackett    22 September 2009 2:05am
I acknowledge that it's easy to be a sideline commentator when it come to commenting on something as complex as governing NSW, but one of the biggest problems facing both the Govt and the opposition seems to be the dearth of talent in their respective ranks. This, coupled with factionalism in both the ALP and the Liberal Party, seems to ensure that people with talent, drive, integrity, and real-life experience (as opposed to the far too common student politics - political staffer - MP route) are effectively kept out of public life in this state.

#19 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    22 September 2009 2:44am
Chris -

1. Well your experience is different to mine. Most Anglican services I go to are pretty good at praying for international and national social and political concerns. But of course, yes, it is meant as a reminder to churches (Anglican or not) to be praying.

2. Self-indulgence? I think that accusation's a bit over the top, to be frank. It's a widley recognised 'literary' convention. In any case, I have found an email that hasn't bounced, so perhaps it has got through.

#20 of 41 top
Justin Moffatt    22 September 2009 2:48am
@Christopher -- We pray every week for Nathan Rees by name. As well as Kevin Rudd (by name), as well as members of federal, state and local governments (in our case, the city).

#21 of 41 top
Michael Canaris    22 September 2009 4:39am
Nice stuff (who knows, you might bring Mirrors for princes back in vogue.)

#22 of 41 top
Michael Canaris    22 September 2009 5:13am
Concerning the 2007 State election result, though, I'd attribute it more to blow-back from the federal situation at the time and continuing gloss from Carr's time in office (broadly speaking, I agree with John Robertson's analysis (albeit not rhetoric) here). Once we lost office federally, my party started to stand a chance at the State level.

#23 of 41 top
Kevin Goddard    22 September 2009 5:17am
. We are praying for you in your (as we believe) divinely-appointed task of leading our state...

I know why you are stating it that way... BUT do we therefore then have to logically conclude that the God of the Universe is implicated in the back-room machinations of the State ALP - and somehow it is God alone who 'makes' ALP conspirators and number-crunchers come to their decisions ? ( Besides, Sussex Street HQ's already think that they ARE God. )

That thinking can-of-worms then unravels to make us look at the question of whether evil dictators such as Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Robert Mugabe and 100's of others have been "divinely appointed" - and if so, to what end ?

#24 of 41 top
Michael Canaris    22 September 2009 5:33am
While Sussex Street number-crunchers aren't exactly my cup of tea, I still reckon it's a bit of a stretch to place them in the same category as Pol Pot, Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe.

While prudential, casuistic and deontological arguments might well proceed as to what ought occur in extremis, it seems that action to depose tyrants has generally been taken by lesser power-brokers and potentially comes at great societal as well as personal cost (especially if unsuccessful.)

#25 of 41 top
Kevin Goddard    22 September 2009 5:41am
While Sussex Street number-crunchers aren't exactly my cup of tea, I still reckon it's a bit of a stretch to place them in the same category as Pol Pot, Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe.


Most definitely, I wasn't trying to place them in the "same category" at all. Rather, by extreme examples, I was trying to make the point that if God "appoints" governments, then that means that He has "appointed" the "evil" ones - along with the "good" ones.

#26 of 41 top
Michael Canaris    22 September 2009 5:58am
That seems fair enough.

#27 of 41 top
Michael Canaris    22 September 2009 6:32am
Still, while tyrants arguably serve various punitive functions at times, mutatis mutandis their usurpations do not seem legitimate in the long run.

#28 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    22 September 2009 6:57am
Well, it's Romans 13 that's the passage I am thinking of.

Of course, the Christian teaching on providence says that God works through even ALP back-room politics, while not endorsing their methods or being culpable for the evils thereof!

#29 of 41 top
Craig Schafer    22 September 2009 10:37am
@christopher - we regularly pray for our political leaders across our services at Pennant Hills too (although one prayer leader I won't name recently prayed for the former premier! That's why I like them to write out their prayers.

Craig
stmarks.com.au

#30 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    23 September 2009 4:51pm
Hey = we made the news!

http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-diary/a-prayer-for-the-leader-20090923-g2q2.html

#31 of 41 top
Justin Moffatt    23 September 2009 7:52pm
Let's turn that into a link! Good work, MPJ.

#32 of 41 top
Rob Stokes    25 September 2009 1:29am
I've got to say I'm a bit puzzled by this letter. It is wonderful to know that Christians are praying for our political leaders. At the same time, I don't know what the reference to John Brogden is all about. John is a very good friend of mine, and was a great representive. He made mistakes - who hasn't - and paid a price for them far higher than other political leaders. So why do you say we weren't able to forgive him? As written, this part of the letter seems a bit sanctimonious and judgemental to me. John is a great bloke who did his best, and I really think he should have been left alone.

#33 of 41 top
Craig Schwarze    25 September 2009 1:41am
Rob, I took it that Michael meant the public were unable to forgive John, and hence he was forced to resign. I don't think Michael was having a go at him.

#34 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    25 September 2009 2:33am
Craig is right. My point was not to bag John Brogden (I have met him, too, and he seems like a good guy.) Rather, the political culture is so unyielding and unforgiving. We SHOULD have been able to forgive him, right?

#35 of 41 top
Rob Stokes    25 September 2009 2:39am
I understand - but the way it came across in the Herald report - to me at least - and a number of others I have spoken to - is that you were having a bit of a shot at John. I can see that was not the intention of the letter. It might still be worth contacting John to let him know - he is now the CEO of the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA)
Cheers!
Rob

#36 of 41 top
Michael Jensen    25 September 2009 2:42am
Right, it was rather poorly described as a 'shot' at John Brogden. Which it clearly wasn't, if you read my original piece. Do you have John's email address? (you can PM me)? Or perhaps you could send him a link to this discussion.

#37 of 41 top
Michael Kellahan    25 September 2009 5:21am
I noticed inspiringpeople.com made the back page today.

#38 of 41 top
Jeremy Halcrow    29 September 2009 10:53pm
Perhaps Jesus All About Life campaign missed the boat..

Poster image - picture of Nathan Rees.

"Thank you Jesus for the NSW Government"

#39 of 41 top
Michael Kellahan    29 September 2009 11:06pm
Jeremy - you do remember what happened to the Jesus loves Osama posters don't you?

#40 of 41 top
Jeremy Halcrow    29 September 2009 11:14pm
I know they divided Christian opinion - but I actually think they 'cut' through.

We should be scared to arrest people's attention and challenge their stereotypes about Christianity.

After all - praying for a Labor leader isn't very 'Anglican' is it? Which is part of what makes Michael's letter surprising to outsiders.

In fact recent research from Essential Media I saw showed that religious affiliation: Roman Catholicism (Labor) and Anglicanism (Liberal) are still one of the strongest factors in determining voting loyalty.

#41 of 41 top
Kevin Goddard    30 September 2009 12:01am
"Thank you Jesus for the NSW Government"


Perhaps with the thought provoking subtext : "But what great sin have we done to deserve them ?"

Or : "And thanks for revealing all those scandals - and reminding us that we are all sinners and that nothing is hidden from the eyes of Almighty God"

#42 of 41 top
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.