AUDIO

by Archbishop Peter Jensen
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
Conflict and Ministry
Craig Schwarze
February 8th, 2011

In my ideal Christian world, all those I like and admire would be in perfect agreement on every matter of importance. This is not the real world I inhabit, of course. In the real world, good Christian men and women disagree over a great many things, and sometimes the disagreements can become sharp conflicts.

How should we deal with these situations, especially when the conflicts revolve around ministry, and involve our leaders? I was helped by a John Piper sermon called "Barnabas: The Weakness of a Great Leader". I'll highlight a few of his points, and add some comments of my own.

"The ministry is made up of many judgment calls, and we will have to learn to disagree on some things without rancor or bitterness or resentment"

One unfortunate tendency is for conflicts over ministry style to descend into character attacks. It's not surprising - we care deeply about ministry, and we get upset when it is done in a way that we consider unhelpful or wrong. It is easy to become frustrated and start feeling that the other person is being intransigent or even malicious. As Piper says, we need to remember that there are a lot of judgement calls in ministry. The other person is not being deliberately obstinate - they simply have a different opinion, and that needs to be respected. We need to learn to disagree in a mature fashion, always assuming the best of those we are at odds with. And if we decide a ministry is not heading in a direction we want to support, we need to depart in a way that, as much as possible, preserves goodwill on all sides.

"Every strength has its corresponding weakness"

A ministry partnership can be a bit like a marriage. There may be a honeymoon-like period where we are dazzled by our partners outstanding qualities, but over the course of time we will become increasingly aware of their shortcomings. This awareness is made more acute by the inevitable periods of stress. In a ministry partnership, as in a marriage, only a charitable spirit will enable us to resist disappointment and disillusionment.

It's worth realising that personal strengths very often have a corresponding weakness, and the greater the strength, the more pronounced the weakness will be. One man might be a very gentle pastor, but lacks the courage to challenge anyone on moral issues. Another might be a bold evangelist, but lacking sensitivivity in one-on-one interactions. The better you get to know someone, the more you will see their flaws, and the more grace you will need to extend.

"Therefore we need each other's different strengths and mustn't envy one another but rather give thanks for God's wisdom"
 
It follows that we should be careful about judging the failings of others, because we all have our own weaknesses. If they don't seem as great as the weaknesses of others, that's simple a failure of self-perception! It is a great foolishness to stand in judgement over our brothers and sisters, deciding who is and who isn't "fit" for God's work. The truth is that we are all broken and weak, and we all stand by God's grace alone. Your brother is doubtless a very imperfect vessel for ministry - but then again, so are you! We need each other's strengths, and if our brother is weak in an area, perhaps it is our gifting to make up for that weakness, just as he may do likewise in turn. God in His infinite wisdom has made us as a body, and the different parts complement one another. We should stop judging each other and instead give thanks for our diverse strengths, and be ready to help each other in our areas of weakness.

"The cause of God will triumph through all the weaknesses and failures of his people."

Conflict in ministry can be a cause of great despair. It is really disheartening to see a ministry go belly up due to a falling out, and at such times, we may well question if God is at work amongst us at all. But we should take heart - through all our fighting and fearing and failing, Jesus has promised to build his church, and nothing will prevail against it. The future is absolutely assured. 

Sandy Grant    09 February 2011 2:20am
Hi Craig, some good observations. Acts is so helpful how it records the early church warts and all, and the Paul-Barnabas split is instructive.

One extra observation is that sometimes time (although rarely time alone) can heal the wounds of conflict and disagreement.

So towards the end of Paul's ministry, he can say, 2 Tim 4:11
Get Mark and bring him with you, because he is helpful to me in my ministry.
Everyone thinks this is the same John Mark over whom Paul and Barnabas split in Acts 15:36-41, with Paul seeing him as unreliable at that stage.

I also refer people to Bruce Burgess' lead article in a Briefing last year, entitled, The hope of biblical peacemaking as a response to the challenge of conflict. The article has links at the end to some very helpful resources from Peacewise, a respected Christian conflict resolution organisation.

You can also read the interchange (letters to the editor) interacting with some possible issues or weaknesses in what is a very helpful article.

Lastly, you can read the new Grievance Policy and Procedure adopted by our last Synod here, although it does not come into effect till later in the year.

#2 of 0 top
Dianne Howard    09 February 2011 3:29am
The Barnabas/Mark conflict only presents us with a conflict decision that was seemingly not a denial of gospel truth. However, just preceding that section of scripture (Acts 15) we are reminded of the urgency of contending for Biblical truth so that people may be saved. Hence the necessity of some conflict.

Another thought re conflict – it is very easy to sideline ‘sin’ in conflict discussions.

Some questions I suggest worth asking during conflict:
Is this a conflict over Biblical truth?
Is there a need for repentance?
What should my response be that will please my heavenly Father?

#3 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    09 February 2011 10:24am
@Sandy - thanks for your encouraging words, and the helpful resources you pointed to. The biblical peacemaking stuff looks good - I'll have to add it to my (ever lengthening) list of books to read.

#4 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    09 February 2011 10:26am
@Di - I agree that we all need to examine ourselves when conflict happens, and sin will usually be present in most situations. But I've often seen differences over ministry styles (for want of a better term) escalate into far more unpleasant conflicts. I also think we need to make allowance for the weaknesses of others. "Forebearance" is a biblical virtue.

#5 of 0 top
Sandy Grant    10 February 2011 12:35am
Di, good questions you suggest asking oneself in conflict.

From having examined it closely, I can assure you neither Ken Sande's book, nor the Peacewise resources which are based on it, overlook the issue of sin, but make quite a point of the need to challenge it (unless it is trivial), although only after examining oneself for sin, and confessing where necessary about the part you might have contributed.

The other thing to say is that the diocesan grievance policy is not designed to address serious sins such as sexual abuse, child abuse, criminal conduct. Nor is it designed to address theological disagreements (nor to discourage strong leadership).

It could have a role in addressing a conflict where a person expressing a strong theological view (right or wrong) has been rude and bullying and abusive in expressing the views.

My point is there are other forums (formal and informal) to address those types of conflict, but I think the grievance policy is focussing especially on grievances arising from relational conflicts.

#6 of 0 top
Sandy Grant    10 February 2011 12:43am
Quite right about forebearance, Craig.

Proverbs 19:11...
A man’s wisdom gives him patience;
it is to his glory to overlook an offence.


Personally I have been praying for some time that God might help me learn the wisdom of Prov 12:16...
A fool shows his annoyance at once,
but a prudent man overlooks an insult.


One needs wisdom to know whether your conflict falls into the Prov 17:14 category...
Starting a quarrel is like breaching a dam;
so drop the matter before a dispute breaks out.


All this comes in the context of a book that highly prizes a well delivered rebuke, and urges us to listen to suchlike. E.g. Prov 27:5-6...
Better is open rebuke than hidden love.

Wounds from a friend can be trusted,
but an enemy multiplies kisses.


When we speak on these matters, in most instances the advice of Prov 15:1 would certainly seem wise...
A gentle answer turns away wrath,
but a harsh word stirs up anger.

#7 of 0 top
Dianne Howard    10 February 2011 4:33am
(sorry to be slow responding...no electricity today)
I thoroughly agree that patience is important, from beginning to end. However I was keen to emphasise the importance of early discernment in conflict. eg what seems like a leadership style clash needs to be considered carefully (especially if escalating) because it may represent different theologies working out in practice.

So the challenge is to pray that our love may abound with knowledge and discernment so that we’ll work out what’s excellent in the situation (Phil 1).

#8 of 0 top
Gill Evans    10 February 2011 5:56am
My understanding is that when there are conflicts very often it is not theologies so much as personalities that are clashing. Often the clash is bullying where one forces or pushes his/her own opinion on to the other. Unfortunately, this often means there is little awareness of one's own reactions. a Tanzanian Bishop I know used to say "when you point the finger, remember that there are three pointing back at you". Peacewise is an excellent resource, but even that doesn't help when one side is blind to what is going on.

#9 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    10 February 2011 6:34am
Hi Dianne - I agree that sometimes there are different theologies causing the conflict. But sometimes (perhaps the majority of times), I believe the clashes are caused by stylistic or personality differences. Theology can then be "drafted in" to rationalise the conflict. We need to be wary of that.

#10 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    10 February 2011 6:47am
@Gill - my concern with what you are saying is that it is easy for *both* parties to conclude that "oh, the other person is not listening".

#11 of 0 top
Gill Evans    10 February 2011 8:41am
I guess I was going off on a tangent with bullying...where one is the bully and the other the bullied. Apologies. I am glad the Diocese has new protocols in place to help with this. over and out.

#12 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    10 February 2011 6:59pm
Another point I was trying to make, though it perhaps didn't come out clearly, is that it's ok to decide to "hop off" a ministry if it's not following a strategy that you want to support.

I think people feel guilty about leaving a ministry for less than theological or moral issues, and so they tend to rationalise problems in these areas when they have decided to part company. In reality, you are the steward of your time and resources, and you are free to put them into any ministry you wish.

#13 of 0 top
Dianne Howard    10 February 2011 11:18pm
Hi Craig

Thanks for the conversation.

I think every decision we make should be influenced by theology. For example, if considering whether to leave a ministry one would need to consider what actions will best bring glory to God. What will be best for the salvation of people? What is loving in the circumstance?

cheers Di

#14 of 0 top
Stephen Davis    11 February 2011 12:29am
I think that probably the most important thing to build any of these types of situations on is the foundation of truth that all Christians stand on. Using this foundation will go a hell of a long way in dealing with conflict, the secret being to separate what are matters essential for salvation against those matters that are not. For the latter, the intensity of conflict should be lessened.

#15 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    11 February 2011 8:00pm
Hi Di,

I appreciate your comments, and am always stimulated by your challenges to return to the gospel and theology. It's good stuff.

What I would say is that there is a fair degree of practical flexibility within the bounds of orthodox theology. The Bible doesn't mandate a strict liturgy for church, to take a simple example. It doesn't mandate what instruments we should use when we sing. It doesn't tell us precisely how we should evangelise. Yet disputes have arisen over all these areas, and the conflicts are often buttressed by theology.

This is the sort of thing I'm thinking of when I call people to express tolerance and charity, and not to overcook the theological angle.

#16 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    11 February 2011 8:00pm
Hi Stephen - it's a good thought. Sadly, agreeing on what are "essential" matters is often times the issue!

#17 of 0 top
Craig Schwarze    11 February 2011 8:08pm
Di, I guess I'm reinforcing what Piper says. There are definite "judgement calls" in ministry - important decisions that are not obviously right or wrong, but depend upon an individuals judgement.

#18 of 0 top
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.