AUDIO
![]() |
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
|
It’s funny how often a challenge becomes an opportunity. My rostered drummer was not available for church last Sunday, and I wanted to give my other drummer the week off. I really dislike having music without percussion, so I asked someone else to fill in - a talented muso who hadn’t been on the roster for a while due to family commitments. He told me he was a bit rusty on a regular kit, so he’d bring along his djembe (a simple African drum) instead.
We went for a cut-down, “unplugged” musical ensemble - djembe, piano and acoustic guitar. I suspected it would work well, but it was even better than I’d imagined. There was an organic, rhythmic flavour to the music. It was softer than our usual sound, but the congregation are good singers now, and their voices swelled to fill up the spaces. It was a great morning of singing, as we did Blessed Be Your Name, How Great is our God, Take My Life and It is not Death to Die. I got lots of encouraging feedback later.
Most contemporary churches are trying to make a standard rock ensemble work - but that can be tricky. For some churches, the way forward is to put away the drum sticks, unplug the guitars, and go for something a little more simple and raw…


Djembe can be used by itself. One song that works well with just African hand drum accompaniment is "All you works of God bless the Lord," a metrical version of the Prayer Book canticle--Benedicite opera omnia--set to the upheat West Indian tune LINSTEAD. The final "bless the Lord" of the refrain can be accented with a hand clap on each syllable.
I also recommend tin whistle, recorder, ulihan bagpipes, mandolin, hammered dulcimer, zither, hand harp, and other folk type instruments. By folk type instruments I am not referring to the old ballads or the folk music of the 1960s or the regional folk music of today but the instruments used in traditional cultures around the world--like the kalimba, or finger piano or the Chinese one string violin. It does not hurt to vary your sound from time to time. Do a plaintive Celtic song. Or a melodious African song with no accompaniment. I find that too many contemporary churches have fallen into a musical rut. They need to diversify!
The first Sunday of every month, I introduce a new song, which is obviously not in alphabetical sequence. It then gets a four week run, then four weeks off, then another four week run to really make sure the congregation know it. This is why the sequence appears as it does.
How's it gone, the 4/4/4 method of learning new songs. Do people show any signs of fatigue with it? I've been reluctant to flog any song that hard in the past, but if it does work well, perhaps I should!
The 4 week method has worked really well. No-one has said anything critical about it, and we have been doing it for five months. And the improvement in the singing has been really, really noticeable. People really learn the songs these days.
Here's what I suggest you do - just pick one good song and repeat it over 4 weeks, choosing the other songs as you regularly do. First see if anyone notices, and comments. Second, compare how well the congregation sing the song on the first week to the fourth week.