AUDIO

by Archbishop Peter Jensen
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
Is rescuing someone healthy?
Nicky Lock
June 19th, 2011

Lots of us are determined “rescuers” – that’s what Christians are meant to be, aren’t we? Go the extra mile; give up our coat (well maybe not this wet and windy week!) kind of people?

Recently I presented a case (anonymously) in my supervision group of a couple who were having particularly heated counselling sessions. As the counsellor, I do have to take some responsibility for a reasonable outcome to the counselling, yet whatever I tried with this couple, nothing was working.

As I outlined the case to my colleagues, one of them commented “oh this is classic drama triangle stuff”. Of course, why hadn’t I sent that? I realised that in the chaos, the couple were inviting me to “rescue” them, so they would not have to do the hard work required.

My colleague was referring to the Karpman Drama Triangle devised by Stephen Karman in the 1960’s to describe the roles we can adopt in certain situations.

We are all mostly familiar with the term “victim” describing someone who doesn’t take responsibility for themselves or what happens in their lives and blames others constantly. We are less familiar with the idea that often when there is a “victim”, those around the victim have been pulled into the drama triangle, often to rescue them. Then there is the persecutor, who criticises and blames the other members of the triangle.

A common one seen in families with teenagers is the teenager who (frequently) doesn’t get themselves up on time and misses the school bus; s/he goes to one parent pleading for a lift to school. The parent berates the child angrily, launching into a string of accusations about all their past failings as a teenager: the by standing parent jumps in, soothingly, “of course, I’ll take you all the way to school, darling”.

The drama of the triangle can be compounded as members move around and adopt other roles. In the case above, the rescuing parent can start to “persecute” the angry parent, telling them all about their failings as a parent and can’t they be more reasonable. The teenager can similarly jump quickly into the persecutor role. Then the originally angry parent can adopt a victim position “you two are as thick as thieves and are always leaving me out of decision making in this household. I feel as if I have no role at all here”. And so on…..

This pattern all too often infests church disputes. Someone is upset with a staff member about what has been said to them. They go to their Bible study group and share and ask for prayer about this “terrible” situation (victim/persecutor). The group lovingly gathers around them, prays and offers to speak to the staff member on the other person’s behalf (are “rescuers”). They can degenerate into “persecutors” by talking with others about the terrible way that the staff member had behaved. Word of the discussions gets back to the staff member – now they feel like the victim and can continue the drama or not.

Is rescuing ever a valid response? Yes – when someone genuinely needs rescuing and the person is in genuine need of rescuing – that is they can’t get themselves out of the situation without assistance, having used all their own resources. The unhealthy rescuer sees themselves as a “helper” or “caretaker”. They need someone to rescue (victim) in order to feel vital and important.

I often ponder Jesus’ words to the man at the pool of Siloam “do you want to get well”. Was that a challenge to his “victimhood”, demanding that the man in some way had to participate in his healing? Do we do this in our dealings with those whom we help?
 

Ernest Burgess    20 June 2011 1:30am
I think your right on the money in regards to "victimhood" of the man at the pool he had been an invalid for 38 years perhaps he got use to the lifestyle and his response to Jesus question was not an emphatic yes! However it seems the great rescuer saw something in the response that perhaps we would have missed, hence the healing. The question for the rescuer is it worth taking the risk? How can we ask/rescue someone to think outside the square of their current situation with a mind that is sometimes incapable of doing so? Recently one of the TV stations had a programme on dole street and they arranged jobs for some of the people in the street it is my understanding that most of them went back to the same lifestyle simply because the money from Centrelink may have been more valuable than to work and perhaps have a better self esteem through work. Regarding the parents and the sleep in child I would have thought it was an absolute no no for a parent to support a child after all they will be together long after the child has moved out of home. no they need to foster healthy supportive relationships with one another right though all life stages.

#2 of 0 top
Stephen Davis    20 June 2011 2:38am
An excellent article Nicky, there is a lot of that "victim" mentality going round at the moment, whether we like it or not, each person is responsible to a large extent for his daily life (Naturally he is not responsible if say, he walks outside and a piece off a flying aircraft drops on him). What aggravates me more about this is that there are so many bleeding hearts in the church pews who will actually support this type of mentality by chiding us with comments like, "We must not judge", "We must love everybody", ad nauseum. I think in a lot of these cases, especially if you know the full circumstances, the best remedy is to tell people the truth regardless of how inconvenient it might be to them, this way the onus is on them to wake up and see the big picture. If they do not do something about their circumstances within reason then that is really their problem in the end. With regards to the Centrelink example mentioned by Ernest above, the mentality held by some that a person is better off getting money for nothing than actually having to work and make an effort is to me an insidious concept, in this case I am referring to able bodied, able minded people who seeme to be suffering from nothing more than an attitude problem. The challenge to the parents of the sleep in child is to make sure that there are no opportunities for the child to play each parent off against the other and the best way to achieve this is unity and consistency on the parents part.

#3 of 0 top
Colin Murdoch    20 June 2011 1:54pm
Nicky said:"Is rescuing ever a valid response? Yes – when someone genuinely needs rescuing and the person is in genuine need of rescuing – that is they can’t get themselves out of the situation without assistance, having used all their own resources." I agree, but would add, that if it is the same person all the time, every time an issue arises, we need to help and enable them, to find ways and solutions to their issues, and encourage them to then address the issue/s in their lives, for this will build confidence in them, and they will rely less on 1 or 2 people and open the doors for them to explore both other options and the option of themselves more; little by little...Some people love to be available and at the beck and call of people in their lives, rescue them, see them through the umpteenth crisis in their life, for it makes the rescuer feel needed, worthwhile and gives them some purpose...However, I have had to encourage people to take a step back sometimes in their relationships, implement some boundaries, refuse not to get hooked in and rescue on occasions; but be an enabler and encourager to them to work it through for the good of both the rescuer and the person looking to be rescued again...

#4 of 0 top
Stephen Davis    21 June 2011 1:36am
To Colin Murdoch - Well said mate!

#5 of 0 top
Nicky Lock    21 June 2011 2:49am
the best remedy is to tell people the truth regardless of how inconvenient it might be to them, this way the onus is on them to wake up and see the big picture.

@ Stephen, I can kind of agree with you on this Stephen, especially with your qualifier of "when you know the full circumstances", but I suppose I wonder how often can we actually know the full circumstances, especially from the other person's perspective. Yes the onus is on them to wake up and see the big picture, but is it our job to tell them? Maybe it is merely our responsibility to NOT rescue them. It is a fine line between being a "persecutor" and challenging someone. For example, with clients who seem to be invoting me to rescue them and do all the hard work, I might throw the problem back at them and ask "what do you think you could do differently that might change things" rather than making all the suggestions, even when I think I can see what needs to change.

#6 of 0 top
Stephen Davis    21 June 2011 2:57am
Thanks Nicky, everything you say has merit, sometimes in these situations I think you choose your battleground, depending on the things you have mentioned
above and the points you make are all relevant things to consider. I think the main difference between a persecutor and a challenger is that a challenger is actually trying to get the person in question to evaluate their situation and if possible do something about it by themselves as far as they are able to before turning to someone for assistance.

#7 of 0 top
Nicky Lock    21 June 2011 3:04am
Nice distinction between persecuting and challenging, Stephen. Sadly I hear reports of some fairly unhelpful "challenges" which colour my views!

#8 of 0 top
Stephen Davis    21 June 2011 3:10am
Thanks again Nicky, I think most fair minded Christians can probably bring an eopisode to mind. Actually this whole blog has some strong links to the book of Job in the Bible which I am reading a good commentary on at the moment. In quite a few places, the commentator points out numerous exhortations by Job's friends that could be easily be labelled as unhelpful challenges. If you have not done a study of this book, I would encourage you to, it is vey good actually once you get into it.

#9 of 0 top
Nicky Lock    21 June 2011 3:44am
Yes the perspectives in Job about how to be with/support the suffering one are really interesting. Most often though, at an extreme point of suffering, I think the friends' "sitting in the dirt" technique can be the most loving.

#10 of 0 top
Dianne Howard    21 June 2011 5:18am
After Job’s counsellors had finished with their advice, God speaks to Job:

Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said:
"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?
(Job 38)

Later God makes his disapproval very clear regarding Job’s three counsellors:

After the LORD had spoken these words to Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite: "My anger burns against you and against your two friends, for you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has. (Job 42)

In the end the helpful Karpman Triangle of relationships (whether for believer or non-believer) is identifying the patterns of behaviour of people who need to repent and turn for help from their creator who teaches what it is to care for others as Christ has cared for them.

As Wiki(!) says of the Karpman Triangle: each player is acting upon their own selfish needs, rather than acting in a genuinely responsible or altruistic manner.

Di

#11 of 0 top
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.