AUDIO
![]() |
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
|
Bible-lovers have very little in common with Australian ethicist Peter Singer.
But there may be one leaf out of his songbook that we are glad to sing from. Or is it just one song from our songbook that he would be happy to harmonise with?
Because we believe that people are created in the image of God, created for relationship with God and created to be his image bearers and servant/leaders of his world, will we not share Singer’s moral outrage for the indifference of the world’s richest billion to the plight of its poorest billion?
24,000 children under five die every day from starvation related illnesses or preventable diseases - 8.8 million small children every year.
In his book The Life You Can Save Singer argues that not one of us would walk past a pond where a child is drowning and hesitate to plunge in and save that child’s life.
We may be dressed in our latest designer label business suit. We may be wearing our favourite Italian leather shoes. We may be off to a meeting with the Prime Minister or morning tea with the Governor General. But not one of us would hesitate to ruin the suit, soil the shoes and arrive at the meeting late and soggy if it meant saving a single life.
How, then, argues Singer, could we sit on our hands or turn a blind eye to 24,000 children dying daily?
Singer argues that, with moderate expressions of generosity, the wealthiest billion can lift the poorest billion out of extreme poverty.
While we believe there is nothing more important than the rescuing of people from the horror of hell to the safe haven of heaven, social, emotional and physical needs still matter.
The Southern American Evangelical Baptist culture of Philip Yancey’s childhood and teenage years was white supremacist, segregationist and racist. They reviled and vilified civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King and John Perkins who pastored black Baptist congregations. They nicknamed Martin Luther King, ‘Martin Lucifer Coon’.
Yancey now says, “The thing that haunts me more than the sins of my past are the sins I might be blind to today.”
I often ask myself and I often ask others, “What sins might we be blind to today?” What might our grandchildren look back at our generation and say, “Why didn’t they get it?” Or, more frighteningly, what might our grandchildren be even blinder to because we turned a blind eye today?
In his 2008 Synod Presidential Address Archbishop Peter Jensen spoke of a Sydney clergyman, R B Hammond, who exercised a remarkable ministry during the Great Depression of the 1930’s.
The Archbishop said, “He modelled for us that typical evangelical alliance between preaching the Gospel and care for the community, an alliance that so wonderfully reflects and adorns the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
The Archbishop went on to speak about the Global Financial Crisis of our own day and said, “I hope we have not forgotten (the biblical virtues of faith, hope and love) for we are going to need them. Faith that God is in control; confidence in his future as being that which fulfils human existence; love from him that makes us generous to others . . . . these are the qualities we are going to need more than ever as a community, as a nation . . . . if Australia does better than others in the crisis, we will bear an even greater responsibility to the poor of the earth.”
Bob Dylan asked in Blowin’ In The Wind, “How many times can a man turn his head and pretend that he just doesn’t see?”
Philip Yancey asks, “What sins am I blind to today?”
For very different reasons, from a very different songbook, we may find ourselves cobbled in the same choir as Peter Singer for just one song as we bellow out that 24,000 children dying from preventable causes is a global social evil we just cannot turn a blind eye to anymore.


If these countries had any foreign debt prior to their rejuvination,then there would be a good case for forgiving it. However there needs to be a balance struck here, people, wherever they are, must ultimately be encouraged to think for themselves and accordingly, to provide for themselves as well.
And why can't we as Christians listen to wise words that come from outside our own family, like these from Peter Singer? The author isn't saying we should listen to everything Singer says, in fact he only deals with one opinion. The bible's mandate to care for the poor is as conspicuous as the one to protect the sanctity of marriage.
Three things about Robert’s comment and Stephen’s endorsement of it:
1. I wouldn’t be wary about engaging with Peter Singer on any moral issue. I’d be eager to wade in on every moral issue. I’d probably get my head kicked in most of the time, but, hey, so what, when John the Baptist spoke up about a moral issue, he lost his!
2. Peter Singer, and Julia Gillard for that matter, and I rarely sing the same songs. They would probably tear most of the pages out of my hymnbook and I would probably tear many pages out of their respective songbooks. When it comes to the worldview that forms the foundation and framework of a person’s ethics and anthropology, they may draw conclusions which 99.91% of the time will collide with mine, and they may draw conclusions that 00.09% of the time will kiss mine. If that happens I am more than happy to acknowledge and affirm the common ground.
3. I don’t think Peter or Julia share my biblical views about marriage and human sexuality but that doesn’t mean that we can’t share some common ground about some other aspects of how people should relate to each other.
Four thoughts on your first response to me,
1. The issues of corrupt governments, incompetent aid delivery and the complexities of aid delivery, and even the age old debate about aid verses development are great issues to raise. Interestingly Singer raises them all, and many other thorny issues, in The Life You Can Save and examines them at length. I hope, and I am not suggesting you are saying this, that these issues will never be for any of us an excuse for paralysis of action.
2. There are plenty of countries where governments are not so corrupt that aid can’t get through. There are plenty of aid and development agencies that work according to best practice procedures laid down by the Australian Council for International Development (ACFID).
3. Because I don’t have confidence in every country and every agency doesn’t mean I can’t have confidence in any or that my generosity can’t make a real difference in many lives.
4. On the aid verses development debate, the following mantra is a classic and a good one, "You can give a man a fish and feed him for a day. You can teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime". But figure if, as we taught him how to fish, we did so on a full stomach while his was howling from hunger. Nuancing aid and development is a tricky business.
I don't like the despot argument because while true in some cases, it is not true across the board. There are many countries where governments are trying to claw their way back from the effects of corrupt leaders and policies. And it continues to be the poor and defenceless who suffer and are without the basic necessities of food, opportunity and choice that we have in abundance. There are ways of helping such people that aren't untenable or inappropriate for us to engage in.
The continent of Africa is interesting to look at as a pretty good proxy for the world's poorest one billion people to see how it could be transformed. As a layperson, my understanding of Africa is that it is a continent rich in natural resources which have been exploited by outsiders working in league with the International Monetary Fund whilst the Africans themselves have been brought into subjection to the greedy interests of these outsiders. In 2002, an African Union was formed, which is a political structure similar to the European Union and which is working towards a common African currency similar to the Euro. The African Union serves to increase Africa's subjection to the outsiders who are currently exploiting it because this Union formalises the outsiders’ control over the continent via policy formulation.
I believe that direct aid to poor countries is important. For example, sponsored kids can grow up into tomorrow’s leaders. Their road is hard and sponsorship is a way of
Continued...
Organisations like the International Monetary Fund operate on the basis that it would take so long for any given person to wake up to their nefarious nature after that person is born and grows up into adulthood, that by the time they do wake up, they will be too old or too apathetic to do anything about it. The IMF is very cunning and portrays itself as a financial saint lending a helping hand, but many people have woken up to the real agenda of the IMF and want to disband it. The climate is ripe right now for a massive public backlash against the IMF.
So my question is, how can we take down the IMF, get the debts of these poor countries forgiven (which often involved the loaning of money created out of nothing via a few taps on a computer keyboard rather than the loaning of hard-earned dollars) and put them back in control of their own money supplies and their own economies without outside interference? When the Micah Challenge ran in previous years, I didn’t understand the IMF like I do today. My mind wasn’t in gear. For my part, I’ll go away and try to learn more about how the IMF brings
Continued...
There are many interrelated issues involved in this subject, including the vested interests of the US government and the British government in keeping certain Third World governments in place (via their intelligence agencies and other means) in order to achieve the best financial outcome for the private banking and corporate interests (involved in the resources of those countries) that these governments answer to. Beyond any doubt, these Western governments are puppets of the banking and corporate elite. John Perkins published a book on this subject in 2004 called “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man†which pulls back the curtain on what has really been going on.
I am only a novice in relation to this entire subject. I believe it is well worth our while to scratch its surface. Until we do, nothing will change because we will not be grappling with reality.
Christians need to promulgate, publish and publicise Christian ethics.
I agree whole-heartedly with Robert at #17 above. He has stated precisely what I was thinking.
With respect to comments 17 to 19:
1.I think the Utilitarian Ethics of Peter Singer are appalling. I think the ethics of the majority of Australians who believe in prenatal infanticide are appalling. I believe that the growing number of Australians who believe in euthanasia is appalling. I believe that politicians who believe these things, and other things, but for political expediency, don't come out and say them is appalling.
2. I think Peter Singer is an appalling person as I am an appalling person. The only hope for Singer and me is the death and resurrection of Jesus. I have, by God's grace, embraced this hope and I pray that Peter will too. It frightens me to think what the trajectory of my sinfulness would have looked like if I hadn't been surprised by grace. I've done enough damage as a Christian through sins of omission as well as commission.
3.If I ever get to meet Peter Singer I will tell him how appalling his ethics are and the unimaginable harm he has caused. I will also thank him for joining the choir of one of the too few voices out of a potential billion voices that is outraged by 24,000 preventable child deaths daily.
4. If I may dare to quote Dylan from Blowin' In The Wind again, "How many ears must one man have before he can hear people (children) cry?
In 1991, the population of the continent of Africa was about 620 million. Today, twenty years later, the population of the continent of Africa is in excess of 1,020 million. That is an increase of a whopping 400 million or 64.5%.
Over this past twenty years, non-government organisations such as World Vision and Compassion have been advocating strongly for Christians to sponsor children in places like Africa. Many people, including myself, have succumbed to this intense pressure and sponsored children, though I have only sponsored a child for a small fraction of these past twenty years.
Clearly, something is not working. The population of Africa has mushroomed beyond our worst nightmares and the problem of poverty remains. It is time for a different approach than this broken record of the past twenty years. We should rather be sending the message to the adults in places like Africa that they should not be having children if they can't afford to care for them. This is grossly irresponsible. To then expect people in other parts of the world to pick up the tab for the living costs of these children and basically underwrite the decision of the parents to conceive the children is absolutely dysfunctional. It is global socialism and it holds no promise for anybody.
Continued...
In 1991 the number of children under 5 who were dying annually from preventable causes was 13 million. Today the number is somewhere between 8.5 and 8.8 million. Couple that raw statistic with the growth rate of Africa that you cited and the picture is even more heartening.
Clearly, something is working.
'Aid' is a broad term for a wide spectrum of activities from emergency relief at one end of the spectrum through to high end development projects with high capacity partners at the other end of the spectrum. Everything along the spectrum is needed. Buzz words for the high end of development include capacity building and sustainability. This is where we want to go but it takes time to get there. The end goal of the long term is responsibility and the sector works hard to achieve these outcomes in the face of the corruption and exploitation that has been well articulated in this discussion.
I also recommend 'Aid and other dirty business' by Giles Bolton (mainly focussing on Africa) and 'Falling off the Edge' (more of an international focus) by Alex Perry.
Other commentors - 'The Fear' by Peter Godwin is a good look at the last few years of political history in Zimbabwe a country where the people are often accused of not 'taking responsibility for themselves'.
And 'The State of Africa' by Martin Meredith.
http://www.rense.com/general94/getting.htm