AUDIO

by Archbishop Peter Jensen
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
Stumbling into the new year
Karin Sowada
January 31st, 2012

Scenes of the PM and Opposition Leader being bustled out of a Canberra function recently bode ill for a more civilised political year. With Federal Parliament set to resume on 7 February, it was a very bad look for the PM, especially as a member of her staff effectively initiated the fracas.

This sort of stuff is straight out of the political dirty tricks handbook. The resulting unexpected publicity is a lesson for one and all, especially the ALP; it has done nothing to increase Julia Gillard's standing with the electorate or within her own party.

What is even more annoying is that whatever you think of Tony Abbott, he actually knows something about Aboriginal issues, more than the average urban MP or political staffer. As Health Minister he spent much time travelling around remote and regional communities speaking with elders; he still regularly heads up to the remote Cape York area and is well-informed on the complexities of indigenous matters.

NSW State Parliament also resumes on 14 February, so here are some pointers to what we can expect during 2012 ...

1. The failure of the Federal Government to honour the commitment to pokie reform with Andrew Wilkie is a further dent in Labor's credibility and continues to undermine public trust in the Gillard Government. Moreover, the elevation of Peter Slipper as Speaker can now be seen in a different light: Harry Jenkins was pushed to shore up the Government's numbers in the expectation that Wilkie would walk away from the table, which he will.

2. Having won this unfortunate victory, the clubs, pubs and liquor industry will continue to strengthen their grip on public policy. It is now clear that few political leaders are prepared to stand up to them. Moreover, as a number of commentators have said, as a community we are prepared to live with the social consequences of both excessive drinking and pokies.

3. It is hard to see the Gillard Government surviving to year's end. Peter Slipper is an unknown quantity, one of Labor's MPs is still under pressure, Andrew Wilkie will withdraw his support, Kevin Rudd is looking to return and other pretenders are waiting for blood in the water. Tony Abbott will continue his relentless negativity and we will certainly see a string of no confidence motions in the House of Representatives as the Opposition tests the numbers.

4. In NSW, this is the year that Barry O'Farrell needs to start doing something. March is the first anniversary of the Coalition's election in NSW yet there seems little to show for it. The Libs need to muscle up to the National Party and get on with its reform agenda. Expect a ministerial re-shuffle mid-year.

5. The gay marriage debate will reach the end game, for now. Its advocates will have a hard time getting their proposals through Federal Parliament, but the issue will not go away. As other western democracies liberalise the laws and people seek marriage overseas, this will put considerable pressure on local legislators to bring our laws into line with overseas practice.

6. With heat now removed from the carbon tax debate, attention will now focus on coal seam gas as the No. 1 'hot button' environment issue in the eastern states, along with water management. Both the NSW State and Federal Governments will feel the pressure on this, particularly with NSW trailing in the economic wake of the mining boom.

7. And of course, there is the risk of global economic meltdown. With IMF leaders speaking of another Great Depression and the US facing the policy paralysis of a Presidential election year, this means challenging economic times ahead. Australia is better placed than most, but policy makers, suoerannuants and many others will face some sleepless nights.

As the political year resumes, please pray for our political leaders as the Scriptures command (see 1 Tim 2:1-4)

Stephen Davis    31 January 2012 12:06pm
Karin, I would hope to God that your prediction in the first sentence at point 3 comes resoundingly true!

#2 of 20 top
Andrew Mackinnon    31 January 2012 5:17pm
No self-respecting male is comfortable being led by a female prime minister because Adam was formed first, then Eve.

#3 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    01 February 2012 8:41am
Many who are first will be last...

#4 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    01 February 2012 8:45am
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled...

#5 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    01 February 2012 9:14am
Though Andrew Mackinnon may fulminate in his splendid isolation, no Anglican can afford to be too dismissive of female rulers, given Elizabeth I's key role in the preservation and consolidation of the English Reformation.

Defensatrix Fidei.

#6 of 20 top
Robert James Elliott    01 February 2012 10:09am
This is not a male/female issue. Gillard's incompetence engulfs all gender boundaries and double-standards. She is an abysmal Prime Minister who no one believes nor takes seriously. The country needs a new election and a new Parliament. The strange part, as one friend said, is that the ALP's feral left now cannot even organise a Canberra riot properly.

Karin: I will in future refrain from criticising your Democrats as, compared to Ms Gillard's ALP, the Democrats were a party of wise government and moderation ...

#7 of 20 top
Stephen Davis    01 February 2012 10:49am
As usual Robert, you are right on the money again mate!

#8 of 20 top
Robert James Elliott    01 February 2012 4:27pm
Australia has suffered enough. Julia Gillard may be a nice person etc but she is inept to a degree that is difficult to accurately describe.

#9 of 20 top
Andrew Mackinnon    01 February 2012 7:10pm
Hi Robert

If you think that Julia Gillard is a nice person who is simply inept, then you have no discernment. It is extraordinarily wearisome to listen to Christians seek to sugarcoat the sins of leaders which affect us all.

Julia Gillard is wittingly and deliberately pursuing the demoralisation of Australia on behalf of the Illuminati to which she reports. She is simply a political puppet whose job is to implement the plans of the global elite for Australia. This same scenario is being played out in countries right across the world and it's time that Christians expose this kind of ploy so that it's completely neutralised. Gender confusion is part of the plans of the Illuminati for humanity which is why they delight in foisting female leaders upon us males in direct contradiction to the natural order of things which Paul referred to in 1 Timothy 2:12-13.

#10 of 20 top
Michael Canaris    01 February 2012 9:29pm
Someone's gone troppo...

#11 of 20 top
Robert James Elliott    02 February 2012 7:45am
I just think Julia Gillard is incompetent and in way above her abilities. I do not think she has any sort of agenda. Leaders have agendas and she is not a leader, just an officeholder.

Andrew - get some help.

#12 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    02 February 2012 9:24am
Andrew Mackinnon @ #10:
Gender confusion is part of the plans of the Illuminati for humanity which is why they delight in foisting female leaders upon us males in direct contradiction to the natural order of things which Paul referred to in 1 Timothy 2:12-13.

The "apostolic" directive here pertains to the body of Christ, not the administration of the nation state. The text of 1 Timothy 2 is not issuing orders about Caesar.

The prime ministership of Australia is open to both men and women. That has nothing to do with one-size-fits-all conspiracy theories or occultic string-pulling; it derives from the consensus of a stable liberal democracy, just like women's right to vote.

The question of Julia G's performance as PM has nothing to do with questions of church order.

#13 of 20 top
Andrew Mackinnon    02 February 2012 1:04pm
Grant, the entire human race is descended from Adam and Eve. Therefore it is not appropriate for adult males to be ruled over by an adult female in any context.

#14 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    02 February 2012 2:58pm
Andrew @ #14:

Nevertheless, according to your God - speaking through the apostle Paul - you are still bound to respect the current PM:

Romans 13 (ESV):
1 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment.
...
5 Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. 6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. 7 Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honour to whom honour is owed.

You owe the legally constituted government of this country - including its duly appointed head, the PM - taxes, revenue, respect, and honour. That's not my view; it's your God's view. There is no waiver of this obligation in the case of heads of government that happen to be female.

#15 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    02 February 2012 3:02pm
And from 1 Peter 2:

13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human authority: whether to the emperor, as the supreme authority, 14 or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. 15 For it is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish people. 16 Live as free people, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as God’s slaves. 17 Show proper respect to everyone, love the family of believers, fear God, honor the emperor.

#16 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    02 February 2012 3:06pm
Andrew, note those phrases submit yourselves (that includes you) and every human authority (that includes the current government of Australia, headed by a female PM)

For the Lord's sake!

#17 of 20 top
Andrew Mackinnon    02 February 2012 6:25pm
No, Grant, you are wrong.

Romans 13:3 says:

"For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil."

Romans 13:4 says:

"For he is God's minister to you for good."

When a ruler becomes a terror to good works as Julia Gillard is and becomes a minister for evil, by passing a carbon dioxide tax based on the lie of 'carbon dioxide-driven climate change' and by advocating homosexual marriage, there is no obligation to submit to such a ruler because to do so would render the Bible's teaching against lies and against homosexuality meaningless.

Romans 13 is talking about submitting to good government, not evil government, otherwise it doesn't make any sense. Christians are not called to submit to evil.

You, Grant, can do whatever you want but I will not submit to a ruler such as Julia Gillard who is pursuing a satanic agenda and I will not submit to a female prime minister - ever - because to do so is to disrespect my own manhood and emasculate myself.

Grant, you love to post responses to my own posts. It would be very flattering if I didn't find you to be so obnoxious. I like responding to your posts as much as I like going for a run in the rain in the middle of winter. So you should measure your words carefully, because I take every possible opportunity to ignore you and leave you talking to yourself.

#18 of 20 top
Grant Hayes    03 February 2012 8:43am
Andrew @ #14:
Grant, the entire human race is descended from Adam and Eve. Therefore it is not appropriate for adult males to be ruled over by an adult female in any context.

To implement this principle would require a segregation of the workplace exceeding even Saudi practices.

A female head nurse would not be allowed to direct a male orderly.

A female doctor would not be allowed to direct a male head nurse.

A female judge would not be able to give instructions to male barristers. Strictly speaking, she would be barred from passing sentence on a convicted male criminal (you did say "any context"). Solution - no female judges!

A young male teacher looking for casual work would have to avoid any school with a female principal, or female head teachers. Solution - gender segregated schools!

A female bus driver would not be permitted to tell a male passenger to remove his muddy feet from the seat in front of him. Solution - no female bus drivers!

A female police officer would not be able to direct male drivers around the scene of an car accident, nor submit males involved in the accident to breath testing. Solution - no female police officers!

No female academic, no matter what her credentials, could be made head of any department with male staff in it. Solution - gender segregated universities! Or, better still, just keep women out of higher education altogether!

And so on, and so on. Just talking to myself...

#19 of 20 top
Russell Powell    03 February 2012 8:54am
(Moderator) Gentlemen, we have strayed off the topic here, which is the comments Karin has made. This is not a debate about male/female Prime Ministers.

#20 of 20 top
Robert James Elliott    03 February 2012 3:03pm
Well said Russell. This is demeaning to all Anglicans.

#21 of 20 top
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.