AUDIO

by Archbishop Peter Jensen
Archbishop Peter Jensen's Christmas Message 2011 on the centrality of Jesus to human history
Weathering the summer storms
Karin Sowada
November 15th, 2011

Financial shudderings of global stock markets in recent weeks are a stark reminder that the problems of the GFC are far from resolved.

Australia is relatively well-insulated, thanks to the prudent financial management of the Howard-Costello years and the early-response stimulus spending of Kevin Rudd’s Government. Unemployment is relatively low compared to other developed economies like the United States, and parts of the country are riding high on a China-led resources boom.

In a move that surprised just about everybody, Wayne Swan was even recently named Euromoney Magazine’s Treasurer of the Year.

The roller-coaster that is the Australian stock market creates a sense of uncertainty when we see each night’s TV headlines. But for many, the impact is distant, unless one is on the verge of retirement and need superannuation savings, or you are the fund manager for the Sydney Anglican Diocesan Endowment (or similar). Here the pain is sharper, more immediate.

With this overall positive picture of the Australian economy, it is astonishing that the Gillard Government has so little traction with the electorate. There is even speculation of a return of Kevin Rudd.

Much of this can be traced to policy mis-steps on issues such as refugees and the carbon tax. More fundamentally it stems from the Government’s perceived lack of legitimacy after a knife-edge election and Gillard’s personal rise to the role of PM. This is further compounded by community confusion over the carbon tax and its long-term costs and benefits. This may settle now that the legislation has passed the parliament. The Government is constrained on all fronts by the independents, the Greens, the unions, the High Court, the lack of talent in its own ranks and of course an aggressive Opposition giving no quarter.

Although things seem uncertain, we should thank God that Australia is actually well-placed to weather the current storms. This is the result of good decisions made by successive governments of both persuasions. Despite the plaudits given to the important reforms of the Hawke-Keating years, the Howard-Costello government built on this foundation with wise financial stewardship.  For all their other faults, on both sides of politics it was a time of visionary economic leadership.

Stephen Davis    16 November 2011 11:53am
I think the lesson to be learned here is that the Australian voting public need to get out of their lazy and indifferent mindset and get politically literate and use their vote responsibly. With the electronic age we are now in the middle of, there is absolutely no excuse whatsoever to claim political ignorance. I am not saying that we all need to be obsessed with politics or become political experts but we all need to have a basic understanding of what is going on around us politically. This will certainly make a difference when voting day comes.

#2 of 4 top
Robert James Elliott    16 November 2011 2:04pm
Indeed, we can be thankful that Australia had reformist governments like the Hawke-Keating and Howard-Costello governments. I would remind SA readers that all during this time, significant parts of the Left (including Karin's Democrats and the Greens) opposed the reforms. Many church groups as well held on to a fantasy that Australia could survive as an economy with high taxes, economic protectionism and a welfare cradle-to-grave mentality. Had Australian Governments not acted in the last 30 years, we would probably have similar problems to those in Europe, albeit our culture would not have tolerated European levels of corruption. The worry of the carbon tax is that it is a European policy for a country that is most like Canada and the USA. Australia is not Belgium or Holland and we will be hit hard by carbon pricing of fuels and the like, whatever else Gillard and Combet say.

Australians need to wake up and become much more financially and politically sophisticated. Too much of our debate is dominated either by Greens, who live in a fantasy world, or by the bogan demographic who want to be told that the world will give them a living, no matter how poorly educated they are, or how many tattoos they have, or how poorly they take responsibility for themselves.

#3 of 4 top
Graham Wintle    20 November 2011 4:09pm
Conservative evangelicals have sometimes been accused of having a blind spot when it comes to economics. At best, it is said, we are silent; at worst, we offer our uncritical support to the policy implications of mainstream economics. I'm afraid this article does everything (and more), to justify the accusation.

#4 of 4 top
Karin Nicole Sowada    25 November 2011 11:50am
Thanks for these comments. I agree that our market-based economic system is not perfect, that income inequality is growing, that many families are finding it hard to make ends meet and globally, that the global poor in many countries are struggling under the weight of debt and internal government corruption. It is right for us as Christians to question the current paradigm and push for changes that will enable a more just and equitable society on a national and global scale. However, that is not what this blog is about. Graham, you are welcome through these pages to air your broader thinking rather than simply dismiss someone else’s commentary on the political dynamics of the day.

On a micro level, perhaps my opinion was too nuanced. I was very surprised at the award given to Wayne Swan, as he inherited an economy which came through GFC No. 1 in good shape, much to the envy of the rest of the developed world. His predecessors on both sides did the hard yards to deliver this and I for one did not think this award was deserved.

#5 of 4 top
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.