As one would expect from the author's earlier scholarly study, and ongoing interest, in the topic of resurrection, this chapter is insightful and commands regard, even when one disagrees with several of its tenets and inferences. This level of writing is most evident in the first section, on resurrection, but is far from absent from the second, the cross. However, this scholarly discipline does not extend to how he portrays ideas, and their protagonists, with which and with whom he disagrees. In exploring the cross, the author's main target is penal substitutionary atonement, and especially Sydney Diocese and Moore Theological College.
















